Dear Jesse, I checked the 1611 KJV link on this site and the verse in Matthew in this discussion is written as you state:
Name is written this way and Jesus is written Iesus.
I think as you do that perhaps Momsage has a revised 1611 KJV. It still has the Old Elizabethan English, but some revision were made to the original version several times in the first hundred or so years after it was published. She may not know that hers is a revision, so is innocently insisting that her version is the original 1611 KJV. If hers is a revision as I explained, then I hope the Lord will show that this is so. If it is not a revision, then we have an impasse here and it may be best to move on to another thread for the sake of peace. God's blessings to you, Momsage and KayDee as the Spirit shows you all the way in this discussion.
Name is written this way and Jesus is written Iesus.
I think as you do that perhaps Momsage has a revised 1611 KJV. It still has the Old Elizabethan English, but some revision were made to the original version several times in the first hundred or so years after it was published. She may not know that hers is a revision, so is innocently insisting that her version is the original 1611 KJV. If hers is a revision as I explained, then I hope the Lord will show that this is so. If it is not a revision, then we have an impasse here and it may be best to move on to another thread for the sake of peace. God's blessings to you, Momsage and KayDee as the Spirit shows you all the way in this discussion.
This comment thread is locked. Please enter a new comment below to start a new comment thread.
Note: Comment threads older than 2 months are automatically locked.
Do you have a Bible comment or question?
Please Sign In or Register to post comments...
Report Comment
Which best represents the problem with the comment?