Hello I would like someone to say a prayer for me I am having a Court issue and health issues, and I would like to know what scriptures in the bible that have prayers, verses I can read
Not that it matters for doctrine but there is a mystery here. I copied the verse from your reply just so we can be sure we are looking at the same verse: " Matthew 1:21 (KJV)." in the KJB 1611 version (not the standard KJB 1611.)
This forum, mine and my son's Thomas Nelson KJB study bibles, another KJB website;" KJV Audio Bible + Gospel Films" all have the name of Jesus in caps.
Thank you, not trying to offend anyone because the belief in this doctrine goes deep. I once believed in the pre-existence of Jesus. In my study, there are too many things that contradict it. Like Matthew 28:19 there is not one baptism done in Scripture, only in the name of Jesus.
John 1:1-5 The reason I understand it as the beginning of Jesus's ministry is John also repeats it in 1 John 1:1 "That was from the beginning". Luke 1:2 also begins his introduction "which from the beginning" it was the beginning of time the apostles were with Jesus. We see in Revelation 19:13 that Jesus's name is called the Word of God, my understanding this is a title it does not say Jesus is God.
Jesus was the Word of God, we see all through Scripture Jesus says it is God's word, not His. In John 1:3 If we take the beginning as Jesus's start of His ministry the beginning of the new creation came into being through Jesus.
We see in John 1:6, that John tells of John the Baptist, a man sent from God, this is also about the beginning of Jesus's ministry when Jesus was anointed the Messiah. In verse 10 it says the world was made by him the Greek word dia could read as well as the world was made through him. That I see as in the plan of God all was through and for Jesus and what He would be since God sees the end the same as the beginning.
The importance that has been placed on this doctrine 400 years after Jesus and the people who have been killed over it, and today many churches will ostracize you. I don't feel the love of God would be in that. If it is that important that it is held equal to the belief in Jesus, Jesus would have told us when He was here but He did not say a word about it.
In His speech to the disciples on the mountain Jesus said many times those words:
"Ye have heard that it hath been said ...But I say unto you..."
or "It hath been said ... But I say unto you..."
Said by whom? Who gave the Law, the commandements in the old times? The answer is, God Himself.
And a question to Jesus could have been. Who are you sir that you dare change God's Laws? What do you make youself when you say "I say" and you put your own words higher than God's words in the past? How do you dare change His Laws?
Let us think, who is eligible to change the Law, to add or subtract to it? The answer is, the person who initially gave the Law, God Himself.
Moses never dared say "I say to you", but he always said "The Lord said".
Only the Lawmaker and Lawgiver is eligible to change His Law, nobody else.
In the vision of St John length of the city,"is as large as the breadth: and he measured the city with the reed, twelve thousand furlongs. The length and the breadth and the height of it are equal." Compare with the city in Ch.48 of the Book of Ezekiel. The exist "of the city on the north side, four thousand and five hundred measures.(48:30-35) and of the other sides also measure the same. Each side has three gate with names of three tribes of Israel. However the height is set in terms of the point fixed. "The Lord is there."It refers to that day signifying that inheritance of the 12 tribes shall occur only after the holy city of God descends from heaven. Thus it is the ground zero to which the lots for the 12 shall take their coordinates.
The city above and the city that Ezekiel describes fall under the foursquare which is not only the Word which is God but also the word that became flesh. He is the Prince the prince of Life to whom Ezekiel refers in Ez.44:3.
An idea of this four square we find in the breastplate of the High Priest. "Foursquare it shall be being doubled; a span shall be the length thereof, and a span shall be the breadth thereof." (Ex.28:16). It is the breastplate of judgement which is intended by 'being doubled.' The Word is unto salvation and also unto judgment. The same idea we saw in the Book bound with seven seals,"a book written within and on the backside, sealed with seven seals."(Re.5:1) Unto this day is what is' written within' signifies. Accordingly we have the holy city of God and New Jerusalem prepared in heaven and Jerusalem inherited by the Mixed People refers to the vision of Ezekiel.
"Behold, I lay in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone, a sure foundation," with 12 foundations for walls and the pearl for several gates evoke urim and thummim.
Please forgive me Chris , when you ask me to clarify ? I can't , because to me it is already clear , I can't add any more to what I have said and I can't add anymore to the scriptures that both Ronald and I have recently posted on this subject because to me they are clear . I don't know how to clarify what is already clear to me . I'm so sorry , I genuinely don't know how to clarify . It seems so obvious to me and I'm sorry that I can't make it any more obvious to you or anyone else . Please don't be offended , I'm not trying to be awkward , I can only say what is in my heart .
We will be blessed to begin a brand new month tomorrow.
I thank God for bringing us this far on our journey and praying He continue to shower us with His loving kindness as long as we live and prosper.
Honor the Almighty God.
Psalms 118:1
Oh give thanks unto the Lord, for he is good. His mercy endureth forever.
Be encouraged__
Psalms 27:13
I had fainted unless I believed to see the goodness of the Lord in the land of the living. Wait on the Lord, be of good courage: wait I say on the Lord.
Praise the Lord:
I kings 5:32
And he spake three thousand proverbs: and his songs were a thousand and five.
King Solomon praised him with words and songs.
Sing to yourself:
Psalms 104:33
Sing the songs that brought
God's people through
sickness and health,
trials and tribulation, heartache and pain,
death and despair.
Aim for the high calling:
Jerimiah 29:11__
"For I know the thoughts that I think toward you, saith the LORD, thoughts of peace, and not of evil, to give you an expected end."
Hold on and hold out:
I Peter 5:4
When the chief Shepherd shall appear you shall receive a crown of glory which fadeth not away.
I thank God for His son Jesus
and praise the Holy Spirit who makes us all ONE. Amen.
I understand John 1:18 speaks of Jesus being monogenes (unique), only begotten Son. Thanks for bringing this up. He is a unique son because He is the only son that is ontologically one with the Father and the Holy Spirit, possessing the divine nature fully and equally along with the Father and the Holy Spirit, thus God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit-one divine nature, but three distinct persons, each divine, but not separate from one another-unified and one.
Here is a verse "I have said, Ye are gods; And all of you are children of the most High. But ye shall die like men, And fall like one of the princes."(Ps.82:6-7) Fullness of God in Christ makes us the children of the most High.
Hi Jaz. Not sure to whom you are directing this comment & particularly those two Scripture portions, so apologies if you are writing to brother Ronald.
My two bits worth for your comment: In Isaiah chapter 13, we read of God's denunciation of Babylon. When we get to verse 12, "I will make a man more precious than fine gold; even a man than the golden wedge of Ophir", the scene of that coming destruction is so great, that men (i.e. fighting men) would be so scarce to find, that if a man can be found alive, his life's worth would be akin to fine gold. That's my understanding - so am not sure what yours is.
And to Ezekiel 44:3 onwards. "Who is this prince?" I understand that the Rabbis generally believe that he refers to the coming Messiah. However, when we consider the passage, we note that the outer East Gate was kept shut and only the LORD God could enter through it. But the prince had access via "the porch of that gate". As well, we read in Ezekiel 45:22 that "upon that day (Passover), shall the prince prepare for himself and for all the people of the land a bullock for a sin offering". Also, this prince has sons to whom he gives gifts of inheritance ( Ezekiel 46:16). So clearly, this prince can never refer to the Messiah, Who would neither offer a sin offering nor have sons, rather to another person of high rank post-captivity (e.g. Zerubbabel, Nehemiah, or another 'prince among the people').
You did also state that "Christ is God manifest in the flesh because he was not born through lust but by the power of God's Holy Spirit and was filled without measure". That certainly is a great statement that Jesus is God manifest in the flesh, but even this can be misunderstood, as we can read it as 'Jesus was endued with the fullness of God's Spirit at His Birth & thus became God in the flesh'; or, 'Jesus came forth from within God's Person to take on human flesh, always endued with God's Spirit'. Maybe you could clarify that for us. Thank you & blessings.
"For what is the hope of the hypocrite, though he hath gained, when God taketh away his soul?/Will God hear his cry when trouble cometh upon him?/ Will he delight himself in the Almighty? will he always call upon God?"
The Book of Job is a set of parables and in this chapter we are dealing with a parable which is the core value of the book. How do we place the sensory values of flesh and blood in terms of soul in terms of the redemption of our soul?. This parable follows twelve other parables.
"Moreover Job continued his parable"(27:1). The above text explains the dilemma of man whose heart is a spiritual space. Forgiving as the Parable of Jesus teaches in Matt.18 is not as personal as one may think. For man chosen before the worlds began and marked for blessings in his Son is a sign as much as God who called him is a sound. "For we brought nothing into this world, and it is certain we can carry nothing out."(1 Ti.6:7) Job puts it eloquently since he is a victim of his human condition, "And said, Naked came I out of my mother's womb, and naked shall I return thither: the LORD gave, and the LORD hath taken away; blessed be the name of the LORD."( Job 1:21). God blessed his latter half, " also the Lord gave Job twice as much as he had before." (42:10). We read that God gave same number of children since the children that he had before were already in the presence of God. This begs the question. Is not the fulness of Christ is also that of God which our natural eyes cannot take in? It is called the land of the living where God is the God of the living. "But as touching the resurrection of the dead, have ye not read that which was spoken unto you by God, saying,/I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? God is not the God of the dead, but of the living."(Matt.22:31-32)
The unforgiving servant for an hundred pence would put his soul in jeopardy. His soul was cast out as was the rich man, "for I am tormented in this flame"( Luke 16:24)
Isaiah 13:12 , who is this man that God will make ? Ezekiel 44:3 all the way through to Ezekiel 48:22 , who is this prince ? As I said previously , it's so frustrating but , we have to agree to disagree, Christ is God manifest in the flesh because he was not born through lust but by the power of God's Holy Spirit and was filled without measure , of God's Holy Spirit . At least I can assume that we can all agree on that . As God said at the burning bush , I will be who will be , I will manifest in whom I will manifest . Jesus is not the first manifestation of God , others received of God's Holy Spirit in measure , Christ received God Holy Spirit without measure , therefore Christ truly is that manifestation spoken of at the burning bush , Christ is Emmanuel , he says : he that has seen me has seen the Father , there's no arguement as to what scripture says , we all read the same Bible . Sadly it's the interpretation . We shall all know the Truth soon enough , looking at what is going on in the middle East it's going to be quite soon I think . Can't wait !
This is the day that the Lord has made I shall rejoice and be glad in it. I'm coming for prayer for my Mom she has to move out of her home asap . I have been looking for a house but nothing has fallen into to place. The application fees are ridiculous and she can't afford to keep paying them just to get denied for the house. I reached out to this home I really want her to get this house. Praying that I get a call back from the realtor tomorrow. In Jesus name . My Mom doesn't want to come to stay with me so as long as God gives her the strength to stay on her own why not. Thanks to all my prayer warriors and my God bless you.
You once asked, 'how then do I view your own position before the Lord?' As I said, I accept you as a brother in Christ, just as I accept all who love His Name & covered by His Blood. But what the Father sees & how He judges, is not in my knowledge or power. Maybe He 'winks at various times of ignorance', but will surely continue to lead us in His Truth.
And I will repeat, the Scriptures you shared were a joy to read, but to adequately deal with this subject of the Deity of Christ, one must open up ALL the Scriptures to reveal the True Christ and not limit oneself to a select few. If we only had the ones you shared here, I would do very well to accept that Jesus had no eternity past (except in the mind of God, yet to be revealed to the World). But there are other Scriptures that I have to deal with, and to avoid them or re-interpret them would not pacify my conscience at all. Blessings to you.
How could Jesus have shared God's Glory before the creation of the worlds, if He only came as a Man over two millennia ago? Was Jesus wrong or misguided in His prayer? Or, have we somehow misunderstood this verse, which seems quite plainly given?
John 20:17 and 1 Corinthians 11:3 (& others): all showing Jesus' subordinate position to the Father, by virtue of His coming in the Flesh.
1 John 2:22. One can easily interpret this verse as given: 'if a person denies the Messiahship of Christ, then he denies/rejects the relationship of the Father to the Son'. But when we couple the same John writing, "And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world" ( 1 John 4:3), we see another view of his understanding.
What are the possible interpretations of this? There may be some who altogether deny the historical Jesus (though they would be few in number, leaning towards ignorance). Then there would be some who believe that Jesus did not come as a human at all, but as a 'phantom', or a vision/dream. This might be believed by some now, but certainly not to those in His days where He preached, showed compassion, touched & was touched physically by so many. So given that John here believes that Jesus' Life on Earth was not as some would proclaim, but rather that John is pointing his readers to this Jesus, Whom they have seen & touched, is not a mere man, but the One from God. The spirit that is not of God doesn't deny the reality of the historical Man Jesus, for "the devils believe, and tremble", but that spirit that is 'against Christ' will always move men to discard the Pre-existent Christ, not affording Him His full Deity & Glory. Onto Page 3.
Brother Ronald. Thanks for those great Scriptures which clearly support your understanding & belief that Jesus Christ made His first appearance on Earth as a human babe & His Words always pointed to His Father & His position on Earth & now in Heaven He as a Son subject to the Father. And so He is, as One coming in the flesh & giving due honor and glory to God in all things. But as you would expect, I cannot leave it there.
In the past, we have discussed John 1:1, & if I remember correctly, "In the beginning" in your understanding, is 'In the beginning of Christ's Ministry' and not 'In the beginning ('arche') of all things' as pertaining to man's perception of the infinite past. So as we read through John 1:1ff, I would find it difficult to apply 'the beginning of Christ's Ministry' to the next verses 2-4, "The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not anything made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men". If Jesus was the recipient & embodiment of God's Word at His Coming to Earth, how could the "the same" (Jesus the Word) be with God in the beginning and 'all things made by Him'? And to this, the apostle speaks of in Colossians 1:13-17: that 'by Jesus were all things created..that He is before all things, and by Him all things consist'.
So, I bring up John 1 here as a spring board to a few of the other Scriptures you've quoted. As mentioned, these are all great verses, yet they only show one aspect of Jesus & not in His Fullness.
You quoted John 17:1-3. Precious verses in a part of His prayer to the Father that they both be glorified, that those whom the Father has given Him might have eternal life & the knowledge of God. But just two verses on, verse 5, Jesus adds this bold statement in His prayer, "And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was". Onto Page 2.
What a great post on the uniqueness of God! I am not trying to add to or take away from anything you said here, just wanted to share something that came to mind as I was reading through this. In Part 2, you showed how God is unique in the way He exists as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Amen!
John 1:18 came to mind and I'm not sure if you considered it or not, but it speaks also of the uniqueness of Christ. In the phrase "the only begotten Son," the word begotten (MONOGENES) can be translated unique. Jesus is the only unique one from the Father, the only one in human form that represents God.
I want to say thank you for all the time you have spent sharing the attributes of God from A to Z.
That is an interesting question, one I'm sure has been overlooked over the years. I probably never would have caught that, or even given it much thought. But that is a good question that you present. I also see in the KJB 1611 that the word name is capitalized to "Name." But what I find more interesting is that Jesus is not in all caps in the 1611, only in modern King James versions is the name JESUS in all caps.
Matthew 1:21 in the 1611 KJB:
"And she shall bring forth a sonne, and thou shalt call his Name Iesus: for hee shall saue his people from their sinnes."
Matthew 1:21 in Modern KJB:
"And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins."
It is interesting to note that the 1611 capitalizes the word Name, but it is not capitalized in modern KJB's which most KJB readers use today. Also in the 1611, only the first letter in Jesus (Iesus) is capitalized, whereas the modern KJB capitalizes every letter JESUS.
That is a tough question to answer. I tried to do some online research but with no luck. I think brother Ronald has given you some good information. Perhaps the word Name is capitalized to bring emphasis to Jesus, as Ronald has mentioned. And then instead of capitalizing the word name in the newer KJB, they capitalized the entire name JESUS.
I hope that Mr. Falculan is a child of God and knows that even though Xara may have helped him a lot, it all came from the Lord. I will pray for him. God Bless :)
I will be praying for your needs, but my hope is that in all these situations you have an understanding with the Lord that in all of this the most important thing is that He's will be done because His will is the absolute best that can happen in answer to prayers. Trust God for His loving, wonderful will to be done. God Bless :)
Dear George: My prayers are with you for peace and comfort.
Matthew 5:4 Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted.
2 Corinthians 1:3-4 3) Blessed be God, even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of mercies, and the God of all comfort; 4) Who comforteth us in all our tribulation, that we may be able to comfort them which are in any trouble, by the comfort wherewith we ourselves are comforted of God. 5For as the sufferings of Christ abound in
Back in the 80s I had a friend whose grandfather was in a care home because of dementia. He was always trying to "escape" and he usually managed it quite well. My friend was the chosen family member to get him back, so she usually had to leave work and find him. She worked for her dad so that was a blessing in this very trying situation for her. Anyway, she or the police would find him and it was difficult convincing him to go back.
I also knew a woman who was a resident of the assisted living community I was in and the staff told me not to agree too take her to her home to get some things she forgot. She had dementia and believed it had only been a few days since she left her home when, in fact, it had been years and the home had already been gone for a long time.
Please don't think your in laws are being selfish. The dementia is the culprit not the father-in-law and it sounds like your mother-in-law is to disabled to cope with her husband.
You and your family might want to get some counseling for families who deal with dementia. I believe it will give you a better understanding of your in laws and also bring you some peace in dealing with this very sad, trying situation. I know my comment is based on very little information about your situation but I hope I have helped in some way. I will, of course, be praying for you and your family and I would like, if you want to, to keep in touch. God Bless:) Your friend and sister in the Lord, Annie.
God bless.
Not that it matters for doctrine but there is a mystery here. I copied the verse from your reply just so we can be sure we are looking at the same verse: " Matthew 1:21 (KJV)." in the KJB 1611 version (not the standard KJB 1611.)
This forum, mine and my son's Thomas Nelson KJB study bibles, another KJB website;" KJV Audio Bible + Gospel Films" all have the name of Jesus in caps.
Like I said, a mystery. God Bless :)
Thank you, not trying to offend anyone because the belief in this doctrine goes deep. I once believed in the pre-existence of Jesus. In my study, there are too many things that contradict it. Like Matthew 28:19 there is not one baptism done in Scripture, only in the name of Jesus.
John 1:1-5 The reason I understand it as the beginning of Jesus's ministry is John also repeats it in 1 John 1:1 "That was from the beginning". Luke 1:2 also begins his introduction "which from the beginning" it was the beginning of time the apostles were with Jesus. We see in Revelation 19:13 that Jesus's name is called the Word of God, my understanding this is a title it does not say Jesus is God.
Jesus was the Word of God, we see all through Scripture Jesus says it is God's word, not His. In John 1:3 If we take the beginning as Jesus's start of His ministry the beginning of the new creation came into being through Jesus.
We see in John 1:6, that John tells of John the Baptist, a man sent from God, this is also about the beginning of Jesus's ministry when Jesus was anointed the Messiah. In verse 10 it says the world was made by him the Greek word dia could read as well as the world was made through him. That I see as in the plan of God all was through and for Jesus and what He would be since God sees the end the same as the beginning.
The importance that has been placed on this doctrine 400 years after Jesus and the people who have been killed over it, and today many churches will ostracize you. I don't feel the love of God would be in that. If it is that important that it is held equal to the belief in Jesus, Jesus would have told us when He was here but He did not say a word about it.
Thanks again brother, I know we do not agree.
God bless,
RLW
"Ye have heard that it hath been said ...But I say unto you..."
or "It hath been said ... But I say unto you..."
Said by whom? Who gave the Law, the commandements in the old times? The answer is, God Himself.
And a question to Jesus could have been. Who are you sir that you dare change God's Laws? What do you make youself when you say "I say" and you put your own words higher than God's words in the past? How do you dare change His Laws?
Let us think, who is eligible to change the Law, to add or subtract to it? The answer is, the person who initially gave the Law, God Himself.
Moses never dared say "I say to you", but he always said "The Lord said".
Only the Lawmaker and Lawgiver is eligible to change His Law, nobody else.
In the vision of St John length of the city,"is as large as the breadth: and he measured the city with the reed, twelve thousand furlongs. The length and the breadth and the height of it are equal." Compare with the city in Ch.48 of the Book of Ezekiel. The exist "of the city on the north side, four thousand and five hundred measures.(48:30-35) and of the other sides also measure the same. Each side has three gate with names of three tribes of Israel. However the height is set in terms of the point fixed. "The Lord is there."It refers to that day signifying that inheritance of the 12 tribes shall occur only after the holy city of God descends from heaven. Thus it is the ground zero to which the lots for the 12 shall take their coordinates.
The city above and the city that Ezekiel describes fall under the foursquare which is not only the Word which is God but also the word that became flesh. He is the Prince the prince of Life to whom Ezekiel refers in Ez.44:3.
An idea of this four square we find in the breastplate of the High Priest. "Foursquare it shall be being doubled; a span shall be the length thereof, and a span shall be the breadth thereof." (Ex.28:16). It is the breastplate of judgement which is intended by 'being doubled.' The Word is unto salvation and also unto judgment. The same idea we saw in the Book bound with seven seals,"a book written within and on the backside, sealed with seven seals."(Re.5:1) Unto this day is what is' written within' signifies. Accordingly we have the holy city of God and New Jerusalem prepared in heaven and Jerusalem inherited by the Mixed People refers to the vision of Ezekiel.
"Behold, I lay in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone, a sure foundation," with 12 foundations for walls and the pearl for several gates evoke urim and thummim.
August
is a few hours away.
We will be blessed to begin a brand new month tomorrow.
I thank God for bringing us this far on our journey and praying He continue to shower us with His loving kindness as long as we live and prosper.
Honor the Almighty God.
Psalms 118:1
Oh give thanks unto the Lord, for he is good. His mercy endureth forever.
Be encouraged__
Psalms 27:13
I had fainted unless I believed to see the goodness of the Lord in the land of the living. Wait on the Lord, be of good courage: wait I say on the Lord.
Praise the Lord:
I kings 5:32
And he spake three thousand proverbs: and his songs were a thousand and five.
King Solomon praised him with words and songs.
Sing to yourself:
Psalms 104:33
Sing the songs that brought
God's people through
sickness and health,
trials and tribulation, heartache and pain,
death and despair.
Aim for the high calling:
Jerimiah 29:11__
"For I know the thoughts that I think toward you, saith the LORD, thoughts of peace, and not of evil, to give you an expected end."
Hold on and hold out:
I Peter 5:4
When the chief Shepherd shall appear you shall receive a crown of glory which fadeth not away.
I thank God for His son Jesus
and praise the Holy Spirit who makes us all ONE. Amen.
I understand John 1:18 speaks of Jesus being monogenes (unique), only begotten Son. Thanks for bringing this up. He is a unique son because He is the only son that is ontologically one with the Father and the Holy Spirit, possessing the divine nature fully and equally along with the Father and the Holy Spirit, thus God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit-one divine nature, but three distinct persons, each divine, but not separate from one another-unified and one.
Here is a verse "I have said, Ye are gods; And all of you are children of the most High. But ye shall die like men, And fall like one of the princes."(Ps.82:6-7) Fullness of God in Christ makes us the children of the most High.
My two bits worth for your comment: In Isaiah chapter 13, we read of God's denunciation of Babylon. When we get to verse 12, "I will make a man more precious than fine gold; even a man than the golden wedge of Ophir", the scene of that coming destruction is so great, that men (i.e. fighting men) would be so scarce to find, that if a man can be found alive, his life's worth would be akin to fine gold. That's my understanding - so am not sure what yours is.
And to Ezekiel 44:3 onwards. "Who is this prince?" I understand that the Rabbis generally believe that he refers to the coming Messiah. However, when we consider the passage, we note that the outer East Gate was kept shut and only the LORD God could enter through it. But the prince had access via "the porch of that gate". As well, we read in Ezekiel 45:22 that "upon that day (Passover), shall the prince prepare for himself and for all the people of the land a bullock for a sin offering". Also, this prince has sons to whom he gives gifts of inheritance ( Ezekiel 46:16). So clearly, this prince can never refer to the Messiah, Who would neither offer a sin offering nor have sons, rather to another person of high rank post-captivity (e.g. Zerubbabel, Nehemiah, or another 'prince among the people').
You did also state that "Christ is God manifest in the flesh because he was not born through lust but by the power of God's Holy Spirit and was filled without measure". That certainly is a great statement that Jesus is God manifest in the flesh, but even this can be misunderstood, as we can read it as 'Jesus was endued with the fullness of God's Spirit at His Birth & thus became God in the flesh'; or, 'Jesus came forth from within God's Person to take on human flesh, always endued with God's Spirit'. Maybe you could clarify that for us. Thank you & blessings.
"For what is the hope of the hypocrite, though he hath gained, when God taketh away his soul?/Will God hear his cry when trouble cometh upon him?/ Will he delight himself in the Almighty? will he always call upon God?"
The Book of Job is a set of parables and in this chapter we are dealing with a parable which is the core value of the book. How do we place the sensory values of flesh and blood in terms of soul in terms of the redemption of our soul?. This parable follows twelve other parables.
"Moreover Job continued his parable"(27:1). The above text explains the dilemma of man whose heart is a spiritual space. Forgiving as the Parable of Jesus teaches in Matt.18 is not as personal as one may think. For man chosen before the worlds began and marked for blessings in his Son is a sign as much as God who called him is a sound. "For we brought nothing into this world, and it is certain we can carry nothing out."(1 Ti.6:7) Job puts it eloquently since he is a victim of his human condition, "And said, Naked came I out of my mother's womb, and naked shall I return thither: the LORD gave, and the LORD hath taken away; blessed be the name of the LORD."( Job 1:21). God blessed his latter half, " also the Lord gave Job twice as much as he had before." (42:10). We read that God gave same number of children since the children that he had before were already in the presence of God. This begs the question. Is not the fulness of Christ is also that of God which our natural eyes cannot take in? It is called the land of the living where God is the God of the living. "But as touching the resurrection of the dead, have ye not read that which was spoken unto you by God, saying,/I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? God is not the God of the dead, but of the living."(Matt.22:31-32)
The unforgiving servant for an hundred pence would put his soul in jeopardy. His soul was cast out as was the rich man, "for I am tormented in this flame"( Luke 16:24)
You once asked, 'how then do I view your own position before the Lord?' As I said, I accept you as a brother in Christ, just as I accept all who love His Name & covered by His Blood. But what the Father sees & how He judges, is not in my knowledge or power. Maybe He 'winks at various times of ignorance', but will surely continue to lead us in His Truth.
And I will repeat, the Scriptures you shared were a joy to read, but to adequately deal with this subject of the Deity of Christ, one must open up ALL the Scriptures to reveal the True Christ and not limit oneself to a select few. If we only had the ones you shared here, I would do very well to accept that Jesus had no eternity past (except in the mind of God, yet to be revealed to the World). But there are other Scriptures that I have to deal with, and to avoid them or re-interpret them would not pacify my conscience at all. Blessings to you.
How could Jesus have shared God's Glory before the creation of the worlds, if He only came as a Man over two millennia ago? Was Jesus wrong or misguided in His prayer? Or, have we somehow misunderstood this verse, which seems quite plainly given?
John 20:17 and 1 Corinthians 11:3 (& others): all showing Jesus' subordinate position to the Father, by virtue of His coming in the Flesh.
1 John 2:22. One can easily interpret this verse as given: 'if a person denies the Messiahship of Christ, then he denies/rejects the relationship of the Father to the Son'. But when we couple the same John writing, "And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world" ( 1 John 4:3), we see another view of his understanding.
What are the possible interpretations of this? There may be some who altogether deny the historical Jesus (though they would be few in number, leaning towards ignorance). Then there would be some who believe that Jesus did not come as a human at all, but as a 'phantom', or a vision/dream. This might be believed by some now, but certainly not to those in His days where He preached, showed compassion, touched & was touched physically by so many. So given that John here believes that Jesus' Life on Earth was not as some would proclaim, but rather that John is pointing his readers to this Jesus, Whom they have seen & touched, is not a mere man, but the One from God. The spirit that is not of God doesn't deny the reality of the historical Man Jesus, for "the devils believe, and tremble", but that spirit that is 'against Christ' will always move men to discard the Pre-existent Christ, not affording Him His full Deity & Glory. Onto Page 3.
Brother Ronald. Thanks for those great Scriptures which clearly support your understanding & belief that Jesus Christ made His first appearance on Earth as a human babe & His Words always pointed to His Father & His position on Earth & now in Heaven He as a Son subject to the Father. And so He is, as One coming in the flesh & giving due honor and glory to God in all things. But as you would expect, I cannot leave it there.
In the past, we have discussed John 1:1, & if I remember correctly, "In the beginning" in your understanding, is 'In the beginning of Christ's Ministry' and not 'In the beginning ('arche') of all things' as pertaining to man's perception of the infinite past. So as we read through John 1:1ff, I would find it difficult to apply 'the beginning of Christ's Ministry' to the next verses 2-4, "The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not anything made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men". If Jesus was the recipient & embodiment of God's Word at His Coming to Earth, how could the "the same" (Jesus the Word) be with God in the beginning and 'all things made by Him'? And to this, the apostle speaks of in Colossians 1:13-17: that 'by Jesus were all things created..that He is before all things, and by Him all things consist'.
So, I bring up John 1 here as a spring board to a few of the other Scriptures you've quoted. As mentioned, these are all great verses, yet they only show one aspect of Jesus & not in His Fullness.
You quoted John 17:1-3. Precious verses in a part of His prayer to the Father that they both be glorified, that those whom the Father has given Him might have eternal life & the knowledge of God. But just two verses on, verse 5, Jesus adds this bold statement in His prayer, "And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was". Onto Page 2.
What a great post on the uniqueness of God! I am not trying to add to or take away from anything you said here, just wanted to share something that came to mind as I was reading through this. In Part 2, you showed how God is unique in the way He exists as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Amen!
John 1:18 came to mind and I'm not sure if you considered it or not, but it speaks also of the uniqueness of Christ. In the phrase "the only begotten Son," the word begotten (MONOGENES) can be translated unique. Jesus is the only unique one from the Father, the only one in human form that represents God.
I want to say thank you for all the time you have spent sharing the attributes of God from A to Z.
God Bless!!!
That is an interesting question, one I'm sure has been overlooked over the years. I probably never would have caught that, or even given it much thought. But that is a good question that you present. I also see in the KJB 1611 that the word name is capitalized to "Name." But what I find more interesting is that Jesus is not in all caps in the 1611, only in modern King James versions is the name JESUS in all caps.
Matthew 1:21 in the 1611 KJB:
"And she shall bring forth a sonne, and thou shalt call his Name Iesus: for hee shall saue his people from their sinnes."
Matthew 1:21 in Modern KJB:
"And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins."
It is interesting to note that the 1611 capitalizes the word Name, but it is not capitalized in modern KJB's which most KJB readers use today. Also in the 1611, only the first letter in Jesus (Iesus) is capitalized, whereas the modern KJB capitalizes every letter JESUS.
That is a tough question to answer. I tried to do some online research but with no luck. I think brother Ronald has given you some good information. Perhaps the word Name is capitalized to bring emphasis to Jesus, as Ronald has mentioned. And then instead of capitalizing the word name in the newer KJB, they capitalized the entire name JESUS.
Blessings!
Just Scripture,
God bless,
RLW
Matthew 1:21.
And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.
God Bless :)
I hope that Mr. Falculan is a child of God and knows that even though Xara may have helped him a lot, it all came from the Lord. I will pray for him. God Bless :)
I will be praying for your needs, but my hope is that in all these situations you have an understanding with the Lord that in all of this the most important thing is that He's will be done because His will is the absolute best that can happen in answer to prayers. Trust God for His loving, wonderful will to be done. God Bless :)
Matthew 5:4 Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted.
2 Corinthians 1:3-4 3) Blessed be God, even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of mercies, and the God of all comfort; 4) Who comforteth us in all our tribulation, that we may be able to comfort them which are in any trouble, by the comfort wherewith we ourselves are comforted of God. 5For as the sufferings of Christ abound in
God Bless :)
Back in the 80s I had a friend whose grandfather was in a care home because of dementia. He was always trying to "escape" and he usually managed it quite well. My friend was the chosen family member to get him back, so she usually had to leave work and find him. She worked for her dad so that was a blessing in this very trying situation for her. Anyway, she or the police would find him and it was difficult convincing him to go back.
I also knew a woman who was a resident of the assisted living community I was in and the staff told me not to agree too take her to her home to get some things she forgot. She had dementia and believed it had only been a few days since she left her home when, in fact, it had been years and the home had already been gone for a long time.
Please don't think your in laws are being selfish. The dementia is the culprit not the father-in-law and it sounds like your mother-in-law is to disabled to cope with her husband.
You and your family might want to get some counseling for families who deal with dementia. I believe it will give you a better understanding of your in laws and also bring you some peace in dealing with this very sad, trying situation. I know my comment is based on very little information about your situation but I hope I have helped in some way. I will, of course, be praying for you and your family and I would like, if you want to, to keep in touch. God Bless:) Your friend and sister in the Lord, Annie.